.............adapter to Chat GPT, I have been entertaining myself with it lately. The assignment given was: "Write a 1000 word essay, in the style of William F. Buckley, Jr., about Donald Trump and Tariffs."
Much fun resulted. Here are a few paragraphs:
I am, as the reader may know, no neophyte in the realm of economic dialectics. I have, with considerable constancy, allied myself with the venerable edifice of classical liberal economics—an edifice first sketched by Smith and polished by the manicured hands of Hayek and Friedman. It is from the lofty watchtower of this ideological architecture that I peer, somewhat dyspeptically, at the resurgent specter of protectionism, not as it was once preached by wool-coated McKinleyites or argued by ink-smudged populists, but as it is now theatrically brandished by one Donald J. Trump.
God, I miss Buckley's use of the language. Nobody talks like this anymore.
Mr. Trump, whom one cannot ignore however strenuously one might try, has made a veritable catechism of tariffs. With the fervor of a man who has discovered a new form of ancient fire, he has resuscitated the dusty implements of economic nationalism and presented them to the American polity with all the solemnity of a patriarch offering stone tablets. One would think he had conjured the tariff ex nihilo, so untroubled is he by precedent or nuance.
Not an expert on the subject myself, but I think Chat GPT misses the extent that Trump uses the threat of tariffs as a cudgel to bring the "art of the deal" into play.
Here we arrive at the crux of the matter, and I must tread delicately, lest I be accused of ivory tower disdain. It is true that many Americans have been ill-served by the globalization of the last three decades. Factories have closed, communities have suffered, and a certain elite consensus has too often ignored the cultural and economic dislocation wrought by untrammeled free trade. But the solution to this malaise is not to embrace the economic equivalent of bloodletting. . . .
Let us, therefore, speak with clarity: trade, like liberty, is messy. It does not guarantee equal outcomes, nor does it always flatter our national pride. But it is, on the whole, a generator of wealth, innovation, and peace. To embrace it is not to surrender sovereignty but to recognize that prosperity is not a zero-sum game.