...............apparently, we are losing it:
. . . which is defined as the “ability to [maintain] focused and sustained attention and delay gratification, while refraining from multitasking.”
A view of life and commercial real estate from Newark and Licking County, Ohio
...............apparently, we are losing it:
. . . which is defined as the “ability to [maintain] focused and sustained attention and delay gratification, while refraining from multitasking.”
When you can’t decide, ask yourself: Which option minimizes future regrets?
Then do that.
-Mark Manson, from here
Western civilization, it seems to me, stands by two great heritages. One is the scientific spirit of adventure—the adventure into the unknown, an unknown which must be recognized as being unknown in order to be explored; the demand that the unanswerable mysteries of the universe remain unanswered; the attitude that all is uncertain; to summarize it—the humility of the intellect. The other great heritage is Christian ethics—the basis of action on love, the brotherhood of all men, the value of the individual—the humility of the spirit.
These two heritages are logically, thoroughly consistent. But logic is not all; one needs one's heart to follow an idea. If people are going back to religion, what are they going back to? Is the modern church a place to give comfort to a man who doubts God‑more, one who disbelieves in God? Is the modern church a place to give comfort and encouragement to the value of such doubts? So far, have we not drawn strength and comfort to maintain the one or the other of these consistent heritages in a way which attacks the values of the other? Is this unavoidable? How can we draw inspiration to support these two pillars of western civilization so that they may stand together in full vigor, mutually unafraid? Is this not the central problem of our time?
-Richard Feynman, from this talk
Die Welt des Glücklichen ist eine andere als die des Unglücklichen.
translated as "The world of the happy is quite different from the world of the unhappy."
The important thing is to sit down at the table and talk. Some things are just easier to say across the remains of a shared meal.
.................notes the times they are a changing';
. . . there are bound to be lots of casualties from the integration of leviathan computational machines into everyday life. It might not be you directly, but there’s bound to be a lot of collateral damage.
Our country is often accused of rank imperialism, but in truth we’d rather putter around our own backyards.
Now and then, though, we need to peek over the garden wall and see how the rest of the world is doing.
If we do so today, we’ll find our sitting president, Donald Trump, feverishly rearranging the scenery and props on the geopolitical stage.
If the play he inherited from his predecessor was “The Decline and Fall of the American Empire,” Trump’s new production is an updated remake of “It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World.”
-Martin Gurri, from this New York Post contribution
trailer for the 1963 movie by that name is here
When something throws you out of easiness, there's something you need to pay attention to. The uneasiness is pulling up something that needs to be cleared. We clear it by looking within ourselves and finding what makes us uneasy, owning it, and forgiving our self because one is a fallible human being. One has to learn to show oneself kindness in the willingness to forgive. This then transfers into willingness to forgive others. Spiritual aspirants must learn to accept things the way they are, not the way they want them to be.
As the rulers of democratic nations are almost always suspected of dishonorable conduct, they in some measure lend the authority of the government to the base practices of which they are accused. They thus afford dangerous examples, which discourage the struggles of virtuous independence and cloak with authority the secret designs of wickedness. If it be asserted that evil passions are found in all ranks of society, that they ascend the throne by hereditary right, and that we may find despicable characters at the head of aristocratic nations as well as in the bosom of a democracy, the plea has but little weight in my estimation. The corruption of men who have casually risen to power has a coarse and vulgar infection to it that renders it dangerous to the multitude. On the contrary, there is a kind of aristocratic refinement and an air of grandeur in the depravity of the great, which frequently prevents it from spreading abroad.
-Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America
......................lacrosse goalie, I can attest to the critical nature of fractions of inches. An amazing save:
Bystanders have no history of their own. They are on the stage but are not part of the action. They are not even audience. The fortunes of the play and of every actor in it depend on the audience whereas the reaction of the bystander has not effect except on himself. But standing in the wings—much like the fireman in the theater—the bystander sees things neither actor or audience notices. Above all, he sees differently from the way actors or audience see. Bystanders reflect—and reflection is a prism rather than a mirror; it refracts.
-Peter F. Drucker, from the Prologue to Adventures of a Bystander: Memoirs
In America—a constitutional republic that build barriers, checks and balances, and the separation of powers within the construct of the national government and between and among the national and state and local governments—the Constitution was established for the explicit intent of defending against the failed experiences of past republics, such as Athens and Rome, as well as the tyranny of the monarchy, such as Britain, or the mob, such as the French Revolution. Nonetheless, even the best minds, armed with the most noble and prudent of purposes, are unlikely to birth a republic forever safe from the relentless manipulation, deceit, and plotting of tyrannical minds and forces. The threat from within is real and always present. I wish it were not so, but experience and history point otherwise.
-Mark R. Levin, On Power
...............................from Farnum Street:
I taught religion once, many years ago, and I greatly enjoyed it. But I never had much use for theology. There are, I am told, some thirty-five thousand different species of flies. But if the theologians had their way, there would only be one, the right Fly. The Creator glories in diversity. And no species is more diverse than those two-legged creatures, Men and Women. Even as a small child I marvelled at their diversity. And I have never met a single uninteresting person. No matter how conformist, how conventional, or how dull, people become fascinating the moment they talk of the things they do, know, or are interested in. Everyone then becomes an individual. The most conventional person I can recall, a banker in a small New England town, who seemed to know nothing but the most hackneyed clichés, became fascinating when he suddenly started talking about buttons throughout the ages—their invention, their shapes, their materials, their functions and uses—with a fire and passion worthy of a great lyrical poet. The subject did not interest me much; the man did. He has become an individual.
-Peter F. Drucker, from the Preface to the New Edition, Adventures of a Bystander: Memoirs
To know that we know what we know, and to know that we do not know what we do not know, that is true knowledge.
thanks Rob
A group of political activists were attempting to show the Master how their ideology would change the world.
The Master listened carefully.
The following day he said, "An ideology is as good or bad as the people who make use of it. If a million wolves were to organize for justice, would they cease to be a million wolves?"
-Anthony de Mello, One Minute Wisdom
................................Matthew McConaughey:
If you cannot stop the lies, become less gullible.
With or without us the future is happening. Tune in.
May our heart carry our feet. Amen
Never give up your right to do the next right thing. This is how we find our way home.
Life's a miraculous journey of false summits until the end. Surrender to this fact. And climb until then.
..........................................constraints:
Now, people will say, “But constraints are limiting.” Yes. That’s the point. A seatbelt “limits” your relationship with the windshield.
But recognize that the best writing involves re-writing. The first draft is usually bad and it gets you into the process of polishing, cutting, and supplementing draft after draft and that’s crucial to creating something readable.
Only when you commit to that, and do it time after time, can you become a writer.
Writing is more of a craft than a profession. You learn by doing.
-Michael Wade, from this substack
But it was more than the historically complex issue of the haves and have-nots. It was a fundamental question of ignorance and intolerance. Hemingway had always considered ignorance and intolerance to be like commas, because you often found them in pairs, and almost never did you find one, ignorance, without its evil twin, intolerance.
-David Baldacci, The Camel Club
Speed creates opportunity. Patience compounds it.
Moving fast will generate more chances. But if you quickly jump from thing to thing, growth will stall.
Get moving and find what works, then do it for decades.
I’m not going to link to any of these contagious anxiety-spreading pieces, for the same reason I don’t go around actively sneezing in people’s faces when I catch a cold. But it’s fair to say I find the topic a little triggering. Because this basic stance toward life – the anxious attempt to scramble to a place of psychological safety, to avoid being condemned to disaster and cast into the void – goes back a long way with me. So it all feels rather personal, and important for me to say that you don’t, actually, have to live like this. It won’t make you happier. It probably won’t even aid your career. You have the option of living with vastly more creativity and calm than the anxiety-merchants would have you believe – provided you can summon the strength of mind to screen them out.
-Oliver Burkeman, from this edition
The pattern is remarkably consistent. We either wildly overestimate the short-term impact of new technologies (remember when blockchain was going to replace every institution within five years?) or we catastrophically underestimate their long-term consequences. Nobody building the early internet imagined it would reshape elections, create trillion-dollar companies, or leave millions of people psychologically dependent on dopamine hits from their phones.
It isn’t just that we fail to predict which technologies will emerge; we fail spectacularly at predicting the second- and third-order effects of the technologies we already have. Social media was supposed to connect the world. It did. It also polarised it. The smartphone was a communication device. It became an anxiety machine for an entire generation of teenagers. Nobody planned these outcomes. They emerged.
-Nicholas Bate, from here
Many people have asked me why the hell I spend so much time writing for free on the internet and that’s the honest reason. It helps me remember. I hope a lot of people read my work, but if they don’t, that’s ok.
-Matt Lakeman, Thoughts on Meaning and Writing
I understand there’s a guy inside me who wants to lay in bed, smoke weed all day, and watch cartoons and watch old movies. My whole life is a series of stratagems to avoid and outwit that guy.
-attributed to Anthony Bourdain