.........................................The Bee:
A view of life and commercial real estate from Newark and Licking County, Ohio
Earning more
money increases freedom.
Spending
less than you earn reduces stress.
But after writing about money for two decades, I am constantly amazed at how bad most of us are at knowing what we want out of money, or how to use it as anything more than a benchmark of status and success.
Morgan Housel, who writes better than most, has a new book coming out, The Art of Spending Money: Simple Choices For A Richer Life. My copy has been ordered.
The truth is, you can’t predict the future. Black swan events, long-term care needs, unexpected medical expenses—these things happen. But the bigger danger for this audience isn’t overspending.
It’s under-living.
Living within your means is a crucial financial skill for anyone. It is especially valuable to someone who just fell into big bucks.
If Congress wants to reclaim the power of the purse it so proudly declares its own, it must take its responsibilities more seriously. Americans are right to be upset at its routine failure to perform its constitutional duties. Appropriating money is only half the job. Anyone can swipe a credit card, but ensuring that the money is spent properly is the inescapable responsibility that comes with the power to spend. You can’t have one without the other. If Congress wants control over the purse strings, it has to own the duty of accountability that comes with it.
Predict that the DOGE weekly live streams listing all the things they are cutting from the federal budget will garner larger rating than any of the news shows on TV.
-Chris Lynch, from here
Who spends money better: the person who spends his own money, or the person who spends other people's money?
-from the Calafia Beach Pundit, who loves his charts
such as this one...........................
.....................................longevity estimates:
The financial impact of overshooting longevity estimates isn’t insignificant, the report said. According to one startling calculation, a 65-year-old man who has met his income replacement ratio goal based on age 95, but is then projected to live only up to 86 because of his high cholesterol, may potentially be able to spend an additional $447,000 in retirement.
Seriously?
This is not a Democrat or Republican issue, nor a liberal or conservative one; it is an existential one for the country. . . .
You could say higher spending is the goal. But all new luxuries become necessities in due time as expectations reset. I suspect part of the reason people don’t feel better off is because financial progress is better measured by wealth, not income. And wealth is just the accumulation of income you haven’t spent. So a lot of people are the financial equivalent of the exerciser who burns 500 calories then immediately offsets it with dessert and is frustrated by the lack of progress despite working so hard.