What we see here is a very important part of scientific methodology, researchers holding conflicting theories spurring each other on to new discoveries and deeper knowledge of the field under examination. The heuristics of the two are almost irrelevant, what is important here is the disagreement as research motor. Also very nicely illustrated is discovery as an evolutionary process spread over time rather than the infamous eureka moment.
-as excerpted from this post at the Renaissance Mathematicus blog
Monday, June 9, 2014
How science is supposed to work...............
Labels:
Disagreement,
Prove it,
Punditry,
Research,
Science
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment